![enola gay movie amazon enola gay movie amazon](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/918-DwFO8oL._AC_SX425_.jpg)
She informs the all- male powers-that-be the trophies “have only caused me misery,” and it’s time to turn them into something positive.
ENOLA GAY MOVIE AMAZON PORTABLE
That said, I can’t say I didn’t walk away without a deeper appreciation of Curie’s contributions to mankind, an assertion summed up best when she approaches the French government offering it her two solid-gold Nobels to be melted down and used to pay for portable X-ray machines. Pike does all she can to flesh her out, but it’s ultimately a failed experiment. All of which could be forgiven if the film took the slightest initiative to provide a glimpse inside Marie’s overactive brain. But here she does ditto for Pierre, a full-blood Parisian. And the real Marie, a proud native of Poland, hardly spoke the King’s English. Then there’s my biggest nitpick, which would be all the British accents! This is France, darn it! Not London. Sorry, Marie's personality just wasn’t that interesting and no attempt to suggest otherwise is going to connect. Such moments come across less as a form of fine acting than a director desperate to stir up some emotion from a taciturn heroine famous for her buttoned-up demeanor and lack of suffering fools. In each of these instances, the tone leans toward the perfunctory, whereas Marie’s many setbacks are a form of auditory terror given all the wailing and shrieking being emitted on cue by Pike.
Like everything in “Radioactive,” their scandalous fling is glossed over in the name of expediency to allow for all of Curie’s greatest hits to be played out on screen, from the Nobel committee initially omitting her name from the award she shared with Pierre in 1902 to her collaborating with eldest daughter Irene (Anya Taylor-Joy), who would also reap a Nobel in chemistry in 1935, in distributing the portable X-ray machines across war-torn Europe.
![enola gay movie amazon enola gay movie amazon](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMDhhNTZhNDYtZTk3OC00OTc2LWI4OTAtNmZhZjhlMGU4ZmRiXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTY5Nzc4MDY@._V1_.jpg)
But it also causes her great embarrassment when it’s discovered she’s been having an affair with her married lab partner Paul Langevin (Aneurin Barnard). His death does open the doors professionally for Marie, replacing her hubby as a professor at the Sorbonne. It might have been a deeper tragedy if Pierre wasn’t already well on his way to the grave via the cancer he contracted by being up close and personal with radium for so many years. The majority of “Radioactive” is devoted to Marie and Pierre’s brief marriage, which thrived until the day the latter was rundown on a Parisian street by a horse-drawn carriage. It’s as if Satrapi doesn’t trust us to weigh these bits of opposing morality on our own. Such asides, while thoughtful, are also a bit ham-handed in how they radically disrupt the flow. The film fast-forwards to the 1940s to depict the fateful flight of the Enola Gay to illustrate the atom’s destructive power, and then to the 1950s to display a cancer-stricken child provided hope via radiation therapy. Satrapi has a bit of a go at exploring that dichotomy, the good-versus-evil divide Marie’s discovery of the existence of radioactivity.
ENOLA GAY MOVIE AMAZON PROFESSIONAL
Not! And that’s a problem for a movie attempting to encapsulate one of the 19th Century’s most rewarding love stories, a personal and professional union that ultimately produced a ground-breaking theorem proving both a cure for cancer and a carcinogen. Those latter two gems are part of an unintentionally awkward exchange between Marie Sklodowska and her husband-to-be, Pierre Curie (“Control’s” Sam Riley), on their first date. The pace is plodding, and the script (culled from Lauren Redniss’ graphic novel) is hampered by an over reliance on expository dialogue: “You’re one of 23 female scientists " “I’ve read your paper on magnetic properties of steel " and my favorite, “I’ve read your paper on crystallization.” It’s more a case of them not making their talents fully available. Not that director Marjane Satrapi (an Oscar nominee for 2007’s daring toon, “Persepolis”) and writer Jack Thorne (“National Treasure”) fail to put their hearts in it. True, it has the always-terrific Rosamund Pike, an Oscar nominee for “Gone Girl,” perfectly cast as the fussy, self-absorbed scientist extraordinaire, but it fails miserably in fulfilling those other two prerequisites. In her down time, she also produced two genius daughters and saved countless lives on World War I battlefields with her revolutionary portable X-ray machines.Ī person this accomplished deserves not just our respect, but a glossy movie replete with a brilliant director, an insightful script and an Oscar-nominated star. Before women in the United States won the right to vote, chemist Marie Curie had already reaped two Nobel prizes, discovered a pair of elements - radium and polonium - and became the first female professor at the Sorbonne.